Skip to main content
Comparisons

Alternatives to chatbots that demo beautifully and disappoint your customers

Building a bot on top of your documents takes an afternoon. Getting it good enough to put in front of your customers is a different story, and that is exactly where most tools leave you on your own. Here we compare the usual options with our assistant.

Honest comparisons: in each one we also say when the tool you already have is the better choice.

Why people end up here

What almost every comparison has in common

01

Building the bot is the easy part

Uploading your documentation takes ten minutes. Getting it to handle the awkward questions, to know when to stay quiet and to sound like your brand takes months of tuning. Most platforms leave you alone at exactly that point.

02

Generic by design

A tool built for every industry knows none of them. A clinic needs to handle appointments and sensitive data; an online shop needs sizes, stock and returns. No amount of prompt writing closes that gap.

03

Nobody guarantees it will not make things up

If the assistant does not cite where each answer comes from, there is no way to tell whether it came from your documentation or from the model. When you answer to customers or patients, that difference matters.

04

The cost grows precisely when it works

Models tied to conversations or resolutions penalise the thing you actually want: the assistant handling more people. You end up measuring success with one eye on the invoice.

Test it with your own documents, not with a generic demo

Send us your real documentation and we will show you the assistant answering the questions your customers actually ask. No commitment, no cost.

Request a free demo
Alternatives to generic AI chatbots

Tell us your challenge. We'll propose a solution.

No commitment. Within 24 hours, you'll receive a proposal with scope, timeline and budget. No fine print.

Book a free call →